Lathan’s meat vs meat, bread vs bread, and veggies vs veggies comparison is obv the way to go!

Step 1- take the sandwiches apart, and divide the parts into respective groups, using “trays of equal mass” (to be subtracted off later)

Step 2- weigh the parts, the AVERAGE WEIGHT per sandwich in bread, meat, cheese, sauce, etc.

Step 3- compare by WEIGHT the amount of food vs amount of food subway vs quiznos, then consider costs.

Step 4- Draw conclusions.

Also, the Subway Website states that the Italian BMT Nutritional value is based on their 9 grain bread, with lettuce, tomato, onions, green peppers, pickles, olives and cheese.

First I don’t really know anyone who goes to subway and gets a sandwich dry. Usually you’ll add mustard and mayonnaise. Also there are other things you can add to your sandwich, and different types of breads, so calculating on a calorie basis is no fun.

Secondly, last I checked Subway has 3 different kinds of cheese, and I highly doubt they have the same fat/calorie content

If you go by the calorie count, then the Quiznos is actually a unhealthy sandwich compared to subway. Subway can give you more food, with less calories.

I rather feel full from eating a real size sandwich.

The fairest comparison would be the Subway Italian BMT to a Quiznos Italian Torpedo.

From the Subway website – http://subway.com/subwayroot/MenuNutrition/Nutrition/pdf/NutritionValues.pdf – the BMT footlong is 900 calories.

From the Quiznos website – http://www.quiznos.com/subsandwiches/Products.aspx?itemType=torpedoes – Torpedo is 810 calories.

900 compared to 810 is ~11%, so you pay 25% more for the Subway sandwich to get 11% more “food”, using the correct agreed upon measurements for food in the universe, calories, NOT size.

I won’t argue which is better, that’s a matter of taste, but your argument is clearly biased and misleading because you measured the wrong “thing”. As a nerd you can’t argue that point.

This.
Many times over.